humble_guest wrote:

Believer wrote: http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=3724
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=3567

Your arguments here contain a serious logical flaw.

Let me give you an analogy of what you're doing.

The Gospel of Barnabas supports the claim that Jesus (pbuh) was not crucified.

The Gospel of Barnabas was written before the Qur'an

Peace Humble guest ,

Since we are talking about logic here, can I ask some questions? How is it that the Gospel of Barnabas contradicts the Epistle of Barnabas? Are they not the same "disciple" of Jesus?

If you believe the Gob [hmm.. BOG backwards] to be true, why is it that this is the only gospel quoting Jesus to deny Himself as being the Messiah? But in the beginning the writer states that He is the Christ [in case you didn't know, Christ and Messiah mean one in the same ]:

Pg 2 Gob: "God has during these past days visited us by his prophet Jesus Christ"

Not to mention the fact that states the Muhammed is the messiah?

Gob states ch 42 'Jesus confessed and said the truth, "I am not the Messiah". Then said the priest: "How shall the Messiah be called?" ... (Jesus answered) "Muhammed is his blessed name"' (chap. 97).

I thought that anything different from the teachings of the quran were false? Muslims love to state that the bible has been corrupted, but the Gob seems to be just as corrput

My favorite is pertaining to polygamy

It is to my understanding that in islam a man can have up to 4 wives [Quran 4:3] and as many slave girls as he wants [Quran 70:30], however in the Gob it states:

Gob ch 115: "Let a man content himself therefore with the wife whom his creator has given him, and let him forget every other woman."

My final question being is: From all of the apocryphl books out there, why is it that this particular gospel stands alone with no support? The Gospels in the NT support eyewitness testimonies, even some of the apocrypal texts support what is said in the NT yet there is nothing to support the Gob? Were they also corrupted?

You can't just take out something you like and just claim that other parts of the same book are corrupt just to fit your fashion because you are desparate to show some type of "proof" that Jesus was indeed "just a prophet" and not GOD. KKK members did that, male chauvanists did that, polygamists and other cults do that need I go on?

This isn't a candy store and this isn't a clothing store. You can't pick and choose what's good for you and your agenda just because you cannot accept what's right in front of you. That's not a good excuse to use anymore.