Christian/Muslim Threadsa must readWow, that was quick. Regarding the G of B, there're some 50 pages in the book discussing the arguments for and against it. The reason I recommend it is because it takes a balanced approach and evaluates the text fairly, especially regarding the forgery argument. I just have a question, have you ever really looked into the research on this text or did you just look it up on a website? It's just strange you'd call it a Medieval forgery when, as a document, its origins and authorship are more verifiable than the four gospels of the Bible today. As for your comments about the Unitarians, I'm not sure if you meant the Unitarians of today. The term is used to describe historical Christian Monotheists who believed in the Divine Unity and prophethood of Jesus, not necessarily the sect of today I think you're referring to. Anyway, it's thoughtless comments like the one above that make most of the debates on the forum here pretty fruitless. People deafly cling to their internet-research and have copy-paste wars. If you trust the word of God why are you even interested whether or not it's verified by scholars? Or do you just read the research that adds to that belief? Thank you sir. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame