Christian/Muslim ThreadsMuhammad on trial: Part 1.
This is not worthy of a comment, if you hold such views you are just as fundamental and no different from a suicide bomber attacking the innocent. You would be forced to become a paedophile because Mohammed practiced it, to be like him? is this what you are trying to say? The culture was non existant, your prophet is an al kamil al Insan the perfect human being whose behaviour stands the test of all time, by 20th century standards he is a paedophile, even islamic scholars say marriage between a 60 something and a 6 year old girl in 7th century arabia was unheard of. Don't you get it? Your prophet is an al Insan al kamil whose behaviour transcends all time for all eternity, I see people dying their hair red, growing their beard a certain length, abstaining from keeping dogs as pets and not wearing silk by your implication if those were tribal customs and belong to the 7th century your prophet is no longer an al kamil al insan and the whole garbage (which is islam) might as well belong in the 7th century and has no relevance to the 20th century.
Was it the practice of the arabs to rub their members against the thighs of pre-pubescent girls? Was it the practice of the arabs to fondle pre-pubescent girls? If I was an arab I would be offended you would dare associate the behaviour of a paedophile against an entire ethnic group. Bring your sources you do not have a leg to stand on, your scholars are unanimous: http://www.angelfire.com/ny/dawahpage/aisha.html You are making a mountain out of a molehill, an argument out of a moot and irrelevant point taken and skewed completely out of context, like I said in a court of law multiple witnesses attesting to the same thing will over rule your solitary evidence taken out of context, you cannot defend this other than appeal to semantic word play and take general statements to be verbatim and verbatim statements to be ambiguous, BRING FORTH ONE INDIVIDUAL IN THIS FORUM WHO REMOTELY AGREES WITH YOU ON THOSE HADITHS
You did state that the hadiths contradict the date of her marriage, you stated the other hadiths place her engagement/betrothal/marriage contract/marriage pre the hijra, show me the hadiths that place her betrothal/engagement/marriage pre the hijra, for you to say they contradict your solitary hadith taken out of context from Hisham.
... Cannot take your word on this, they referred to classical scholars, you are the one who is in error, bring forth your lexicon interpretations of what Nikah means (don't tell me you are unable to bring forth a meaning when your foot is in your mouth) |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame