Christian/Muslim ThreadsMuhammad on trial: Part 1.Correct they were not biological brothers. The hadeeth denotes that Abu Bakr thought, maybe due to some old Arab custom, due to the close relationship between him and the prophet made it harram to marry his daughter, In which Abu Bakr replied " But I am your brother" the Prophet clearified " You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book..etc" confirming that it was halal to marry her. Her age has nothing to do with this questioning, and again she was already engaged to someone else before the prophet. Or a distorted report. Correct. Its only difference is to the rights of property of the husband and the dowry that was given. Aburaees, you have misunderstood my stance. My appeal is that he did not marry her at 6 but at 9-10. When he consumated the marriage I have no doubt that she was already in her puberty stage. All evidence we posted shows she was in her puberty and was classified as a woman. As for me if he consumated it when she was 9-10 or three years later it is of irrelevance. He was not a pedophile and does not fit under the meaning of the word. The out cry by westerners is mere prejudice not even understanding their own history mereless biblical history and customs. Right now if such a case was brought before an eastern Christian they woudl see it as perfectly normal. This is the problem between east and west. The character by those other than your self have demostrated pure prejudice in a secular and cultural bias view. Nothing from the Bible could be quoted to support one's secular view of what they call a pedophile. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame