Christian/Muslim ThreadsMuhammad on trial: Part 1.Aburaees, we were showing a relative contradiction in the idea adopted from hadeeth that the Nikah took place when compaired to the time line periods. I dont know what happend I must have omitted a sentence when pasting that spoke of that quote when compared to the historical time line. As I have clearly shown before there is contradiction in the report of the age of her Nikah. I am sure you see this, but for some reason it is not registering to some of you. Isnt this suppose to be like a trial thingy here ? All we are seeing is prejudice and cultural biase on the seat of secular veiws. *Did many of you forget in a trial or in any bases to establish truth conflicting evidence is thrown out as not credible unless there is some other means to approve one or the other is correct. Numbers do not contradict and are the bases of abosolute truth inside and outside religion. After showing clearly the contradictions which cannot be proven wrong, people still hold to their wanton motives of propagating something that has been proven not credible and incorrect. *Aburaees, we have proven the that the transmission of her age is unrealiable whereas we find absolutely no conflict in the time line of cosumation in which the prophit as the reports express our Prophet did not consume the Marriage until 3 years after the nikah. I dont see any Christian contesting the arguement of how could she be 6 years of age in 623 ACE ~ when she got married if she was 18 in 632 ACE when our prophet (s.a.w.)passed away. Can any of you provide contrary evidence ? Our evidence has been made clear as to the authenticity of the age report. Now where is the Christian evidence from the Bible. Aburaees I have already given you the Jewish commentary and quotation on the Bible verse. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame