Now apart from repeated questions and issues, which have already been dealth, and some points of which I was unable to understand, and massive text in which no point was made or to which I agreed anyway,
I think I have virtually answered and replied to every argument.
One trouble in arguing with Muslims is having to deal with a Muslim understanding and paradigm, which they enforce upon Christianity, such as the claim that the Gospel originally was a book.
The GOSPEL IS AN ACCOUNT, Muslims seem to be reluctant to absorb this idea.
I wonder how Muslims would take it, if any future religion would claim to be correct and superior and sought to read their doctrine and ideas into Islam.
I assume if anyone wants to understand Islam, Islamic sources and belief would be the superiority of sources; we Christians do not exclude that.
But on the other if a Muslim should attempt to understand Christianity, he ought to learn from Christianity and the New Testament, not the Qur'an and not from a Muslim context.
There is the reality of critical scholarship, but before the Muslim utilizes these opinions, he needs to remember that there is a Islamic critical scholarship too.
The question is whether Muslims are open enough to approach this research with openess.
I am happy to continue this debate Muslim gladiator, but rather than dealing with and replying to extensively large posts, MAY I SUGGEST THAT WE DEAL WITH ONE TOPIC AT THE TIME.
If you had dealt with our replies to your first post, the posting of long posts such as these lasts ones would have been unnecessary.
Also I wonder, how many are able to follow along; at least the accumulation of so many topics became confusing even for me.
SO CAN WE AGREE ON ONE TOPIC AT THE TIME, AND SHORTER POSTS.