Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesCritical Identity of BaptismYour responses have gone from incomprehensible to.... (I don't know - what's worse than "incomprehensible"?) I think you're just being silly on purpose cause you know you're caught in yet another blunder. In the end, though, I may prove to be the silly one because I guess I don't have the sense to stop trying to get an honest answer out of you. When you agreed that history (in scripture) is profitable for doctrine, you contradicted Aineo's point that Acts contained "history and very little doctrine", since you agree all scripture (which includes all of Acts whether you classify it as historical or not) is "profitable for doctrine". So my question is why are you arguing with me and not him? Did you guys cut each other's fingers with a Cub Scout knife up in your treehouse and take a "blood brothers" oath that you would never dispute one another in public? (or did you do it in the Church basement, as adults?) |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame