Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesCritical Identity of BaptismLOL! (sometimes I don't know whether to laugh or cry at your responses, but I've heard laughter is healthier, so.... ) You got it wrong again. You're arguing away and you haven't even comprehended the point of the discussion. It boggles the mind. Would you like to re-read the last few posts? I don't know what else to say? Do you realize you're AGREEING with me? Let's review the conversation... 1) Aineo said that Acts was mainly historical, not doctrinal 2) I took exception to this by quoting the verse that indicates ALL scripture is profitable for doctrine, and Acts, of course, is scripture, therefore, ALL of it is profitable for doctrine 3) You jumped in and started to defend Aineo, and somewhere between then and your last post, you've apparently had a "senior moment"? so... YES history can be profitable for doctrine, as you say, and we AGREE. ALL of Acts is then "profitable for doctrine" - which refutes Aineo's position. So why are you arguing with me and not AINEO????? :roll: |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame