Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesCritical Identity of BaptismLet's see, I said... "Does one have to speak KJ-eese when one is a spiritual man?" to which you replied... "Who said that it did?" Why do you find it hard to believe I don't understand your response?
Scripture:1124{graphe}a writing, thing written. The Scripture, used to denote either the book itself, or its contents. Scripture:[n] any writing that is regarded as sacred by a religious group. I not only accept doctrine as Scripture but History as well. Are we clear of that? [/quote] Here folks, is our first example from "Evasiveness 101". Let's review what just happened here - I asked did Omega believe that ALL scripture is profitable for doctrine, as the verse says...OR....does he believe Acts is not scripture? Very simple point - ALL scripture is profitable for doctrine, therefore, if Acts is scripture, then ALL of it is profitable for doctrine, whether it is (also) history or not. To which Omega replies - "I not only accept doctrine as scripture but history as well" Notice how this response totally avoids the entire point of my question? Let's review again in case anyone missed it.... a) ALL scripture is profitable for doctrine b) Acts is scripture therefore... Is ALL of Acts profitable for doctrine, yes or no? Omega: "I not only accept doctrine as scripture but history as well" Yet I am the one who is "playing games"? |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame