Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesCritical Identity of BaptismHow can you even post a claim that "The name Jesus has no intrinsic meaning in English"? It is one thing to disagree on the Godhead, or speaking in tongues, or water baptism but to come out and deny the name of Jesus is reprobate. And don't come back saying otherwise! You have plainly quoted the name of JESUS is meaningless. Tell me if the name JESUS is not the correct pronunciation in English or not the actual name as you propose then that name [JESUS] would have no spiritual significance when in envoked in prayer or baptism. Errors about the name of Jesus end up certifying the practices of Pharisee Judaism as being the correct way to God and heaven without the name of JESUS, by going back under the Law and by using some claimed O.T. name of God that saves better than the name of Jesus? The Christian faith is not based upon O.T. titles and methods of Jewish, Catholic, or Prostestant mysticism that tries to discover the lost name so they need not to confess faith in the revealed salvation name of Jesus. There is a more sure word of prophecy on the true name of God than your Nicolaitane interpretation. The name of JESUS was prophesied by an angel to be the name all Gentiles and Jews would put their trust in for salvation AND IN THAT DAY THERE WOULD BE ONE NAME OF GOD (Isa 11:10; 12:4; Zech 14:9; Luke 1:31). That name [JESUS] was prophesied to Mary before Jesus was born (the more sure word of prophecy) (Matt 12:21; Rom 15:12). |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame