Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesCritical Identity of BaptismWhats your point? Aineo stated that Acts contained very little doctrine, I stated that since History is considered scripture as well, It can be PROFITABLE for Doctrine. Containing doctrine and using historical source which can be PROFITABLE for doctrine are not the same. If you agree with me thats fine, I agreed that with Aineo that Acts does contain little doctrine, however historical studies can be profitable for Doctrine, whats your point? Pay attention Brad! Who is having a senior moment here? I responded to get you to recognize that History can also be profitable for doctrine, apparently it took many posts for you to get my point. What comes around goes around. God Bless! |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame