Helix, going back to your post, you have made a logical error in the beginning. There is a logical difference between trying to prove a universal negative and trying to prove a positive.
"There is no god" does require the person, in order to prove himself correct, to have been in all places at all times -- in this case to have been a god himself! So that particular statement is fallacious from the beginning! However the statement "There is a god" only requires ONE place at ONE time for a god to be there.
Let's bring this down to something easier to see:
"There are no intelligent females." This requires the person saying this to be able to have seen and checked the mental capabilities of all females from all time.
"There are intelligent females" requires -- since the statement is plural -- only to find two in existence from any time or place.
See the difference? That is why it is said that a universal negative cannot be proved.
Going on to stars being born in nebula, I'm afraid that is a bit overblown. We can presume they are born in nebula, but we really do not have any evidence of that, for we have never seen a star born! We have seen them die, but we have never seen one born.
As far as the pantheon of pagan gods, I have referred people to Two Babylons a number of times now. The research is impeccable. The gods were not invented by men, they were, originally, men. "Ham", the son of Noah, means 'burnt one." It may be that his skin was very dark. However that later slid into "Herm", or "the burning one" and he was the original 'sun god' which came down through time in a number of cultures. The 'es' ending means 'out of' or 'son of', and thus we see the name Moses being one 'out of water'. In like manner, Hermes was the son of Herm, or Ham. Also known as Cush. We get the word 'chaos' from Cush. He was probably the architect of the tower of Babel. The gods of Greece, Egypt, Norway, etc. etc. all had their roots in the early apostates, the leaders of the first great rebellion after the Flood.
If you are interested in actual researched material instead of simply trying to bolster your own beliefs, you might try reading at least the first few chapters of that book. It is online here:
http://philologos.org/__eb-ttb/default.htm