I am not making stuff up. By not contributing to the other threads you abandoned the discussion just like Reaper did when I refuted his Granville laws.
I keep bringing up the same Scriptures because you and others refuse to address those Scriptures. Also I do know what the word "context" means. What you have refused to do is put Scripture in context by accepting a doctrine that is fully defeated by God's word. One God does not equate to a triune God. One does not mean three in one. You also lamely avoid the fact I have refuted assumption like since God is Lord and Jesus is Lord therefore Jesus is God. This absolutetruth is a logical fallacy. Abraham was addressed as "lord" so does this make Abraham God? In Acts 25 King Agrippa is addressed as "lord", in Revelation 7 John calls an angel "lord", but you do not assume King Agrippa or angels are God do you?
Now, since we find throughout Scripture that the Father is the only and true God how can you assume Jesus who is not the Father is God except by taking Scripture out of context and striving over words?