Webmaster made a good point. As to starting a new thread, you have tried to take every thread off topic by ignoring the purpose of the thread so why should I start another thread you can spam with the same arguments that do not address the historical and linguistic evidence that proves how Trinitarian translators mistranslated Scriptures like Philippians 2:5-11? Also when you put Philippians 2:5-11 in its full context Paul is not teaching the preexistence of Jesus, which is another reason your interpretation is incorrect.
When non-Jews resort to non-Jewish philosophical concepts to interpret the Scriptures then referring to people who interpret Scripture based on what 4th century Greeks influenced by their pagan environments declared as God's truth is to refer to historical truth, which is another aspect of this debate you choose to ignore.
You see Believer all you have done is post generalities and ignored the specifics. Clement and Origen were educated in classical not Koine Greek and they wrote in classical not Koine Greek. Therefore when you avoid the fact the NT was written in Koine and not classical Greek you avoided that part of this discussion.
Also you were removed as a moderator after you abandoned this board and ceased to cooperate in the active management of this board, which means you lack the authority to dictate anything to anyone.
Now, since the Bible is clear that God is one, is not a son of man, is the only true and wise God, that Jesus was born of a woman, exalted to God's right hand, is God's Anointed One, was appointed God's heir, and High Priest your insistence that Jesus preexisted as a divine entity has not been proved on this thread or any other thread.