First I believe there is but one God the Father (1 Corinthians 8:6), therefore I do not reject deity.
There is not a Unitarian Church where I live, so no I no longer attend a local congregation, however if I did then my pastor would teach the Bible not manmade traditions as God's truth.
The Scriptures you posted do not prove the Trinity and I was referring to the plethora of Scriptures that plainly state there is but one true and wise God the Father. However, the many I have posted in response to Believer are a good place to start.
As to lashing out, it is simple courtesy to respond to questions posed by anyone who rejects your interpretation of Scripture and so far on 4 message boards not a single Trinitarian has been able to disprove there is but one God the Father.
I know you believe in the Trinity as defined by the First Council of Nicea in 325 and refined by the Council of Constantinope in 381. I also know that even a cursory reading of Paul's epistles will show Paul was not a Trinitarian, therefore by quoting Paul yet rejecting what Paul wrote demonstrates you do not really believe 2 Timothy 3:16.
Another aspect of this debate is that when Scripture is quoted such as Peter saying "you are the Christ the son of the living God" instead of words to the effect that Jesus is God the Son, they run away.
Now if you want to engage in respectful and courteous diaglogue that is fine but to violate our Forum Rules with your second post indicates that you are not interested in the search for God's truth. Now what Forum
Rule am I referring to?
7. No “I’m a better person than you are”. Our members run the gambit from people of faith to atheists. Keep this is mind and refrain from lifting yourself above all others in knowledge, value, orthodoxy, etc. For our Christian members remember there are many faiths but only One Lord, your denomination, doctrine, or understanding of the Bible may not be universally accepted by others.
By labeling me an atheist you are in effect saying you are better than those who reject the Trinity as a valid Biblical doctrine.
As to what Bible I am using? I can prove my point with the KJ although I prefer to use either the NASB or the NJKV.