Christian/Muslim ThreadsLucifers Pride!It doesnt matter if I beleive in the Bible has the word of God or not. the fact is that you beleive in the bible to be the word of God, and I am giving you the reasons why you shouln't beleive in it has the word of God. And all my reasoning is based on the Bible, which you can dispute nor disprove, while quoting your Bible, you only deny it, with your un-biblical statements, which still are not refuting my argu,ments, they only are desperate attempts to refute them, obivoulsly without Biblical evidence. I didnt say that I dont want you to quote the Quran, to argue your points, I only said was that anything you say needs evidence, dont just rant rant rant, provide evindence and then deduce any conclution from it. Like me I alsways quoted a Biblical verse and then expounded on the meanings of it, o in some cases I compared two different biblical statements to prove how un-founded the Christian theological position is. You never quoted any verse in the Quran, or evn criticised on in this debate, but I do encourage you to do so, cause thats how you will learn about Islam. It was not a mud slinging attempt, I never did the mud slinging in that, every argument that I raised was based on your own Bible, I didnt even quoted the Quran, not until I proved my point using the Bible, only then I quoted the Quran to further strenthen my Islamic beleife. Infact it was you and your Christian friends who did the MUd slinging toward Islam, no evidence just rants and raves. If you are keen on mud slinging first sling it at the Bible, cause all my arguments are from your own Bible, and you have not disproved any of them (which I know are irrefutable, even if Pope tried to refute them). I never mentioned laying down any rules, I only told you:
I hope you will read the bold parts, cause it seems that you are not reading my responses with your glasses on. I never walk in the boxing ring and start laying down the rules, only rules I want to fallow and y opponent to fallow that are no kicking, no head butting, no biting, and no swearing. Same in a theological debate the rules should be. Attacking: 1) Evidence 2) Argument based on the Evidence given Defending: 1) Quote the Attackers arguments in there context 2) Correct it if it needs correction by citing various other refferences Reponses need to be in a systametic manner, not quote one section and then leave half and then respond to the two lines, and then finish it. Rebuttles need to be systematic so the readers can fallow the each argument easily, No Mud Slinging without evidence. I am sure that you will no disagree with any of the above. These rules dont favour me in any way nor they favour you any way, they are perfectly neutral. And these rules I have been fallowing sinces my debate career started. Well no it doesnt the conversation, you dont beleive in the Quran, and you dont understand it, but you have section in this board, Contradiction One in the Quran or somthing like that. If you want to end this debate you only need to get rid of this site, and I will not be here at all, I wouldnt have the reason to be here, only if you remove the data which criticises the Islamic beleife, or Quran then I will not come here. What you say, are you willing to do that, obviously not. So I am not going until I have ironed out the truth of Islam. WAs-salam Ali |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame