ArchivedWas Jesus a real personThe theory of evolution is collapsing my friend! and the existence of God is clearly seen.
The Collapsing Myth: the theory of Evolution
Authorities who attended the conferences declared that the scientific data refutes Darwinism totally and indicates an indisputable Creation fact. They continued by saying that at the time of Darwin who had suggested the theory in the 18th century, microbiology was not known as a science and that it was impossible to explain the origin of living beings without the electron microscope which had not been discovered at that time.
"Nowadays an amazing movement is taking place in the ancient land of Turkey. Years of ignorance in society and an evolutionary takeover in education will no longer be tolerated. The Turkish Science and Research Foundation has met the challenge and is now encouraging the Turkish people to return to their moral base by holding on their belief in creation.
In July the Foundation held two well-attended and provocative seminars, as an onset of a series of international and national conferences titled "The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution and the Creation Truth". On July 4 about 1200 attendees gathered in Istanbul to hear from Dr.Duane T. Gish and Dr.Kenneth Cumming - two well-known scientists on biochemistry and paleontology- the fact that the theory of evolution is a ruthless claim and a big fallacy. On July 5 the second of the series of conferences took place in Istanbul. The speakers included ICR (American Institute for Creation Research) President Dr. John Morris, professor of Geology (a veteran of numerous trips to Turkey in search of Noah's Ark), speaking on the relevance of creation to society. Dr. Duane T. Gish, Professor of Chemistry and Palaentology, also Vice President of ICR, spoke on the lack of evidence for human evolution, showing many powerful slide illustrations. Dr. Carl Fliermans, professor of Microbiology and Ecology, Dr. David Menton, Professor of Anatomy, Dr. Ed Boudreaux, Professor of Chemistry, Dr. Micheal Girouard, Professor of Biology and Dr. Cevat Babuna, a well-known Turkish scientist and the Chairman of the Federation of Gynaecology, spoke on various biochemical and cellular evidences for creation and against evolution. Representatives from many newspapers and television stations were present to document this newsworthy event.
Dr. Gish, Menton and Boudreaux attended the third of the conferences, organised by the Science and Research Foundation, on the theory of evolution, on July 12 in Ankara - the capital city at the Sheraton hotel, with 3000 government employees and university academics present.
Authorities who attended the conferences declared that the scientific data refutes Darwinism totally and indicates an indisputable Creation fact. They continued by saying that at the time of Darwin who had suggested the theory in the 18th century, microbiology was not known as a science and that it was impossible to explain the origin of living beings without the electron microscope which had not been discovered at that time.
After the international conferences, the local ones are now continuing. Up until now conferences were already held in various cities of Turkey, including Afyon, Gaziantep, Sakarya, Edirne, Urfa, Trabzon, Izmir and Samsun, together with graphical poster exhibitions. There are yet more to come. Conferences will continue throughout Turkey and also in various parts of the world, wherever the Creation Truth needs to be disclosed."
When we pore through the Western media, we frequently come across the theory of evolution expounded by Charles Darwin. Media organisations, well-known and respectable magazines periodically bring this subject in their agendas. They try to impose upon us that this theory is an absolutely proven fact leaving no room for discussion. The most common tactic they employ is that the evolution chain is completed by the recent discovery of a "lost link".
These types of news, for instance, the news of a skull being found in some corner of the world is demonstrated as the most striking evidence of the "ape-like" ancestors of the human being. The common people reading such material will naturally start to think that the evolution theory is a proven fact as certain as any physics law. They start to perceive the theory, which claims that life formed as a result of a chain of coincidences, as a law widely accepted by scientific circles. However, the reality here is totally different. The theory of evolution is in essence very far from explaining how life originated. Besides, each new development as seen from the biological perspective brings forth newer problems for the evolutionists, making it impossible to explain it away by evolutionary theory.
The Admittance of the Impossible
The reason why evolution remains insufficient to explain these stalemates is because life stands on an infinite equilibrium starting from the proteins, the building blocks of life, to the human body, the most complex of living things. The evolutionary theory denies the existence of conscious creation, cannot bring any explanation to the question of how this equilibrium is established and protected without consciousness, but only with coincidences.
However, these scales are so scrupulous and many that it is not reasonable and sensible to assert that these came into being by coincidence. There is no probability of even a single one of the millions of factors making up life to form by coincidence. For instance, forming of a protein which is the building block of the living cells is impossible to explain by coincidence, since a protein is made up of the combination of an average of 1000-1500 aminoacids of 20 different types in a certain sequence. Even a single error in this sequence would render the protein useless. To assert that such a sequence formed by coincidence is totally irrational. One of the foremost supporters of evolution, the Russian scientist A. I. Oparin confesses this impossibility in his book The Origin of Life, "Even the simplest of these materials (proteins), consisting of thousands of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen atoms, each with a unique design presents highly sophisticated structure.
For those who study the structure of the proteins, it is as hopeless for these proteins to be formed by chance as the famous poem "Aeneid" by Roman poet Virgillius to be composed of letters of the alphabet scattered all around." (A. I. Oparin, Origin of Life, p.132-133)
Which one would be more logical? To accept that a poem is written by a conscious poet, or to claim that the letter assortments arbitrarily dispersed on a piece of paper as a result of "impossible coincidences" and produced this verse? Evolution accepts the latter.
Another evolution scientist confesses the impossibility of the accidental formation of a protein by giving another example. According to him, the probability of the formation of only one of the proteins required for life (Cytochrome-C) is "as likely as the probability of a monkey writing the history of humanity in the typewriter without a fault - taking for granted that it pushes the keys at random".
Certainly, to approve such a probability means pushing aside the most basic principals of reason and common sense. Even a single letter neatly written on a piece of paper would mean that it was written by someone. A book of history on humanity would make it absolutely definite that it is written by an author; nobody unless having a mental disorder would claim that these letters have come together "by coincidence". The interesting thing is that what evolution defends is exactly this nonsensical assertion. Yet, the examples above are only the probability calculations made on the formation possibility of a single protein. However, millions of similar "impossible coincidences" should have been realized consecutively in order for the evolution process to be completed. Evolution is another way of admitting these impossibilities blindly.
This raises the question of why the evolutionists insist and continue to defend this extremely absurd assertion, and further try to impose this deception on the people via means of the media?
The scientist whom we quoted earlier who used the example of a "monkey using a typewriter", says other interesting things about this subject as well. "The probability of the formation of a Cytochrome-C sequence is as low as zero. If life requires a certain sequence, this is as likely as to be realized once in the whole universe. Or it can be said that some metaphysical powers beyond our definition should have acted in its formation. To accept the latter is not appropriate for the scientific goal. Therefore we have to take the first hypothesis into account."As explained above, evolution is in fact not a theory supported by scientific discoveries. Conversely, this theory is fabricated by logical inferences and then turned into a taboo form to be imposed on people despite scientific realities. Again, as we are told above, this attempt has a goal and what is more important is that this goal necessitates denial of the fact that all livings things are created by God.
This then leads us to the real mission behind the Evolutionary Theory. This theory has been advanced not to reveal the facts, but to distort them. Its major purpose is to abolish religious beliefs.
What can be the reason for this? Who would benefit from the elimination of religion so as to fabricate such a big lie for that end and inject it into the minds of the masses?
The Ideological basis behind Evolutionary theory
In order to comprehend why evolution theory is defended doggedly, we have to concentrate on backstage historical developments regarding this theory.
It is a fact that Europe was basically controlled by the Church until the modern ages. Starting from the 16th century, this order based on religious principles started to conflict with the interests of some social groups which gained power. Acquiring great wealth through commerce but having no political power, this class started a long struggle to exterminate the authority of the Church. (For instance, the French Revolution was a huge social transformation realized by the attempts of this wealthy class).
But these secular powers fought with the Church not only on political and social but also on a philosophical grounds. Religious beliefs had to be weakened in order to abolish the order ruled by religion. All the 18th century enlightenment intellectuals and 19th century positivists were of this class and were supported by the same class.
The gap that arose as a consequence of the weakening or elimination of religious beliefs was filled later by the ideologies produced by this same social class. First was liberalism. Liberalism was followed by socialism, which developed as a reaction to it. Later came fascism meddled with racism.
These ideologies, despite their contradictory features, were all by-products of the new secular system and stood on the same anti-religion ground. None of them spoke of man and his responsibility towards his Creator and the obligation of living according to His rules. Conversely, the principles that necessitated adherence to religion were harmful for them. The reality that "man was created" did not serve their purpose.
Because of this, they needed an explanation to prove that man was "not created". It was very noteworthy that socialism, the most radical and outspoken of these ideologies and being anti-religion, showed great zeal. Karl Marx wrote of Darwin and his book, Origin of the Species in his letter to his friend and comrade Friedrich Engels dated December 18, 1860 as, this is the book which presents the natural historical basis of their ideologies. (Marx and Engels Letters, Vol. 2, p. 426)
Darwinism laid the basis for fascism which is one of the by-products of the new secular order. Holding some human races superior to others, this notion offered that some races exceeded over others as a result of evolution. This opinion called "Social Darwinism" inspired many racists from Arthur de Gobineau to Adolf Hitler. Darwin himself prepared the ground for racism by proposing that the white man was ahead of the blacks within the evolutionary process.
Besides socialism and fascism, the capitalist ideology which is dominant over the Western world and even nearly all the world, is in need of evolution in terms of philosophy. To convince people that man was "not created" and to make people submit to this opinion was necessary in the long run to secure this ideology and its world order.
It is very noteworthy that major capitalist dynasties like Rockefeller and Carnegie were among the first to grant both financial and verbal support to the flourishing of Darwinism in U.S.A. Various foundations like Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Institution established by these two dynasties gave great financial support to the Evolution researches conducted up to now. Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson who noted this subject in their book "The Hidden History of Human Race", highlight that the Carnegie Institution was virtually aiming for the victory of "the scientific cosmological vision claiming to take place of old religious cosmologies" by its support. Rockefeller Foundation supports the same "materialist cosmology" and serves the mission of "the progression of the modern civilization striving to restrict the concepts of God and spirit to the world of mythology".
The evolution propaganda in the distinguished media organs of the West and "remarkable" science magazines, is a consequence of this ideological requirement. Being ideologically essential, evolution was turned into an indisputable taboo by the circles setting the standards of science. The other scientists had to defend this forced paradigm or at least to keep silent to be able to pursue their careers.
Packed Lies
The ideological meaning of evolution causes it to be supported with great zeal by the media organs believing in its importance. On the other hand, evolutionists make great use of this advantage granted them by the "brain washing" program of the media. Many people believe in evolution unconditionally that they do not even bother to ask "how" and "why" the evolutionists say a certain thing. This is the reason why the evolutionists can make their lies easily persuasive after covering them up in decorated packages.
For instance, even in the most "scientific" evolutionist books, the "transfer from water to land" which is one of the biggest stalemates of evolution is explained in ridiculous simplicity. According to evolution, life started in water and the first developed animals are fish. The theory asserts that one day these fish started to fling themselves to the land whatever the reason (!). (Most of the time, drought was said to be the reasonfor this). And according to the theory again, the fish chose to live on land, happened to have feet instead of fins and lungs instead of gills.
Most books on evolution do not tell the "how" of the subject. Even in the most "scientific" of sources, the absurdity of this assertion is concealed behind some sentences such as "the transfer from water to land realized".
How was this "transfer" realized? We know that a fish cannot live more than a few minutes out of water. If we suppose that the alleged drought had realized and the fish had to move towards the land, what could have happened to the fish? The response is evident. All of the fish coming out of water would die one by one in a few minutes. This is what would happen even a thousand years ago. The fish would die one by one. Nobody can say that "maybe some of these fish happened to acquire a lung at the end of the fourth million year at its dying moment. This is entirely nonsensical. But this is exactly what the evolutionists hypothise. "Transfer from water to land", "transfer from land to air" and many more alleged leaps are explained by these unreasonable explanations. The evolutionists find it better for themselves not to touch upon the formation of extreme organs such as the eye and ear.
The "transitional intermediate forms" employed by the evolutionists to prove these imaginary transformations are good examples of forgery and distortion. For instance, a fish called Coelacanth (Rhipitistian Crossopterigian) presented by the evolutionists to be the transitional form from water to land and as an organism which has disappeared almost 70 million years ago is found to exist in 1939 near Madagascar to the astonishment of the evolutionists. The same fish is caught almost 50 times in the open seas. And it is seen that the organs that cause the evolutionists to present it as the "transitional intermediate form" (inner ear alcoves, head typed backbone and swimming bag), do not carry such properties at all.
The same is true for all other fossils presented as "transitional intermediate forms". Some confessions of the evolutionists on the subject are quite interesting. For instance, well-known nature scientist A.H. Clark says; "Since we have no single evidence indicating a transition between fossiles and living groups, then we should necessarily accept that such transitional forms did never exist."
A well-known genetic and evolutionist, Richard B. Goldschimdt confesses that there is no such a thing as "the transitional intermediate form" and then accepts that the species "originated all of a sudden". And it is clear that "to originate all of a sudden" means to be created.
Although evolutionists are embarrassed in scientific platforms, they do not face hard times in deceiving the ordinary folk within the "limits of science". You draw an imaginary picture representing transfer to water from land, you invent Latin words for the animal in water, its "descendant" on land, and the "transitional intermediate form" in between (which is an imaginary animal) and then fabricate a lie; "Eusthenopteron transformed into first Rhipitistian Crossoptergian, then Ichthyostega in a long evolutionary process". If you put these words in the mouth of a scientist with thick glasses and a white apron, you succeed in convincing many people. Because the day after, the media which devoted itself to spread the news on evolution, would announce the good news to the world with great enthusiasm. For the majority who see the world through the media's eyes, this evidence would be more than sufficient.
Another packaged lie is the "reconstruction" drawings produced by the evolutionists. You can find many of these in the evolutionist publications. In these drawings, half-ape half-human creatures are seen as a family. Having hairy bodies, slightly bended walking beings, and a face between man and ape, these creatures are pictured according to the so-called fossils found by the evolutionist scientists.
However, these drawings make no sense. Because the fossils found provide knowledge only on the bone structure of the living things. These fossils do not reveal any information on how "hairy" the body of the thing was. In the same way, one would not have any information on the nose, ears, lips and hair of the living thing. However, the evolutionists picture mostly the organs like nose, lip and ear as half-man, half-ape.
In this way, you can obtain an imaginary intermediate form by adding the nose, ears and lips of an ape to a human skull.
The evolutionists invent such pompous stories that they can associate many different faces with the same skull. For instance, the three totally unlike reconstructions of a fossil called Australopithecus Robustus (Zinjanthropus) sets a good example. The imaginary Nebraska Man "discovered" out of a pig's tooth and pictured along with his family with a half-human, half-ape appearance is another example illustrating the extent of the evolutionists power of imagination.
These imaginary drawings remain satisfactory for many drawing themto believe in evolution. How come such eminent scientists could fabricate all these?
But these scientists "fabricate" these tables in the fullest sense of the word. Because, evolution is nothing but a logical fabrication that cannot be certified by any substantial (empirical) discovery. The reason why this fabrication is publicized in all corners of the world for a century and a half as an absolute fact, is because it sustains the modern world order ruled by secular ideological systems. As depicted in this article, the ideologies of this world order need Darwinist concepts to justify themselves and therefore continue to keep this great deception alive.
Conclusion
All the information revealed by modern biology shows that the origin of life, especially the molecular structure of the living things, cannot be explained by coincidence. The superior consciousness ruling over all the universe is the ultimate evidence of God's existence. As a matter of fact, the eminent names of microbiology have come to a stance where they cannot defend evolution anymore. Instead, another theory starts to spread among these scientists: the theory of "intelligent design"
The scientists defending this theory remark that it is very evident that life has been created by a conscious "designer". There is a very substantial reality and a very simple logic in prospect: a complex system or a very detailed construction can only evolve in furtherance of a conscious design. For instance, nobody who has seen the Rushmore mountain in U.S.A. would doubt that the faces on this mountain were designed. Because the faces of the four American presidents carved on the mountain are indeed works of art. It would be totally nonsensical to assert that these have formed by coincidence, that is to say through some natural factors like wind, earthquakes or thunderbolts.
This is the point where science leads us to. As the living world is further explored, an apparent design is revealed which introduces God and His eternal power. We do not necessarily have to see Him to admit His existence. God introduces Himself to us with the perfect order He created in the universe. But the evolutionists are left at a dead end since they are unable to admit this substantial reality. And they will well continue to be in chaos unless they admit to this fact."
Does this help in any way my friend?
It is written:Revelation 21:3-5 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful. God loved the world so much that He became part of it. And in the hereafter He will say,"IT IS GOOD!"
God Bless!
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |