Innane
This debate is getting really innane. Jack Wheaton did not say that Christians have "blind faith".
"... there is no evidence that goes against our beliefs". What about the web site that Jack provided a link to? Is that not evidence? What you mean to say is, "I am a Christian of faith, who DOES NOT BELIEVE the evidence against the existence of Jesus."
Of course there is evidence, you just choose to ignore it. If there was no evidence, why would people like Delphi and Jack Wheaton think that Jesus did not exist?
I think that you've run out of arguments, actually. When finally presented with the URL of a web site which considers both sides of the argument, you simply give up, because you can think of nothing more that is sensible to say.
It is true that Humanists are more likely to have a logical debate over the existence of Jesus, as they do not have a vested interest in defending their faith. Jack is right, Christians will never believe that Jesus did not exist, otherwise they wouldn't be Christians!