Pharoah

First of all, we are still not sure what the date of Exodus is for sure. Because using Exodus scholars have suggested that the date of Exodus was in the 1400 B.C., Scholars have suggested that it was Thutmose III who was the pharoah of Exodus, but the problem with that is that we still have the sarcophagus of Thutmose III, and the events described in the exodus, well we know nothing like that happened during his reign, the same goes for Rameses II.

In Quran it has been said that even the Pharoah drowned, now using Egyptology we know that the pharoahs always led their army. Now even if Merneptah is not the pharoah of exodus it doesnt make that sura a mistake because Merneptah died of drowning and shock, and he was found well preserved, so he is the best guess of the pharoah mentioned in the Quran. Merneptah is the supposed pharoah of exodus according to Catholic Encyclopedia:

Merneptah I
(1234?-1214 B.C.), the fourth king of the nineteenth Egyptian dynasty and the supposed Pharaoh of the Exodus, was the thirteenth son of Rameses II whom he succeeded in or about 1234 B.C., being then long past middle age. His rule lasted some twenty years, during which he carried on considerable building operations in the Delta, and notably at Tanis (Zoan), where, indeed as elsewhere, he usurped a number of some of his predecessors' monuments. His original works are comparatively few and insignificant. His name is constantly found on the monuments of his father; it appears also in Nubia, and in the old quarries in the Sinaitic peninsula. In his third year, he quelled a revolt to the northeast, possibly excited by the Hittites' and in his fifth year, he repelled an invasion of Egypt by the Lybians and their allies, which victory is boastfully described on a black granite stela found in 1896 in his funeral temple at Thebes, and bearing the earliest known reference to Israel. He is commonly regarded as the Pharaoh of the Exodus on the following grounds.

On the one hand, Egyptian discoveries have shown that Rameses II founded the cities represented in Exodus., i, 11, as built by the oppressed Hebrews, and therefore point to him as the Pharaoh of the oppression.
On the other hand, Ex., ii, 23; iv, 19, imply that the immediate successor of that Pharaoh was on the throne when Moses returned to Egypt where he soon delivered his people. Whence it is not unnaturally inferred that Merneptah I, Rameses son and successor, is the Pharaoh of the Exodus.

Scholars are debating over who the real pharoah of exodus was, but even if it is not Merneptah, then that does not mean the Quran made a mistake, because Merneptah is not mentioned by name. And second, about the Bible being altered, well i cant give you much evidence other than the Quran and that we dont have the original Bible and that the author of Matthew, luke, and John are unknown since they talk in third person view in those gospels.

I believe you that the theory of expanding universe is in the Bible because we believe that Bible was also sent from God, and not all of them has been altered.

I dont know why you regard it offensively when i said to study the Suras, i dont see nothing wrong with that, i mean if you want to find the error in the suras then you have to study them, right?

thank you.