Quran and Bible debateVerse 5:116 :: Re: Muhammad(pbuh)Re: Muhammad(pbuh) Now you are contradicting yourself, which is typical of Muslims. From your post made Sat Jun 02, 2007 02:50 pm: I do not see a "just cause" is this statement. Add to this that secular historians without an agenda easily refute your subtle lie that Muhammad's wars were in a "just cause". Muhammad was a power hungry opportunist who used any perceived insult as a reason to go to war.
This is an interesting paragraph full of speculation and false statements. The first Christians were Jews who understood their own Scriptures and understood that Jesus is their prophesied Messiah. All you have done is try to obfuscate history. Also since the foundation of Christianity is Judaism and Jesus is prophesied in the OT that is where we start with the Bible to show that Jesus is the unique Son of God. Since what I posted was to show that your statement concerning God does not have a son is false why not refute those Scriptures instead of trying to avoid what you posted. Now why don't you think instead of parroting Muslim lies? The Jews always rebelled against God's will and killed God's prophets while retaining what those prophets said and wrote as part of their history. Common sense tells you that David is not God's begotten son, since we know David's father's name was Jesse. Common sense also tells you that some of the OT is poetic language that uses allegory, metaphor, anthropomorphism, and other figures of speech. There is no such scroll as the "Nag Hammadi scroll", what was discovered in 1945 is what is commonly referred to as the Nag Hammadi library, a collection of scrolls that have been dated to the late 4th century. This library is an important find since it gives us a better understanding of Christian Gnosticism, a heretical religious philosophy that tried to merge Christian truth and Greek philosophy. The "one verse" that you appeal to is from a Gnostic Gospel that dates to the 2nd century and was not written by an eye witness to the crucifixion. So once again you have confirmed that Muhammad appealed to what was known (and rejected) by those who understood Gnosticism. If you expect me to take you seriously at least post truth and not fables that are easily refuted. As to "Islamic science", it has all been refuted by what we know from the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and other Greek philosophers was common knowledge centuries before Muhammad was born. Common sense alone tells us the Islamic apologists force what they want to believe on the vague comments Muhammad claimed to be divine revelations. So milk comes from the udder which is located between the heart and the "refuse", when I look at a cow or goat I can see where the udder is and do not need to understand animal physiology to understand that milk is good to drink or where it comes from. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame