ArchivedChristadelphianism :: Poor research, not in the slightest convincing.Poor research, not in the slightest convincing. Actually, I believe you might be referring to the word "trias" here, not "trinity" or "tri-unity". "Trinitas" was a phrase first used by Tertullian. But this is besides the point, because neither of them actually had the same Christology or Pneumatology as you and they also defined the words "trias" and "trinitas" differently to the way you try to claim they defined them. Either way, this is irrelevant as there is no mention of 1 John 5v7 here. This is irrelevant also, as there is no mention of 1 John 5v7 here. Its merely someone stating their definition of God. If this is supposed to be a quote of 1 John 5v7, then I'm a monkey's uncle. He is simply making a statement of his beliefs and defining what he means by them. Again, this is irrelevant as it makes no mention of 1 John 5v7. You cannot claim he was quoting it here, because it says "Father, Son and Paraclete", not "Father, Word and Spirit" as the Johannine Comma states. This, alongside Evangelion's argument on Cyprian, shows that this passage is at least 300 years too late to be considered valid. Mind if I join you for some cheese and wine Evangelion? |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame