Archivedbad theology of Dr Ross.Aineo said: Aineo If all you had done was question Ross's theology I would not call it 'ad hominem'. What makes is a personal attack is your ascribing motives, sinister agendas, and the like. The essays posted by Tuppence, and she herself, have used terms like "dishonest" and "misleading" to discribe him. That is a personal attack, period. You now, in the above post, say "placed their knowledge and intellect above God’s truth." Again, this a a judgement that speaks to your heart Aineo, do you not see this? I have never found Ross to elevate himself above scripture, and this accusation stems only from your disagreement with his opinion. Why do you descend to this level??? Aineo said: Tup asked me three questions, I answered them, she rebutted, and we just disagree, what else do you want me to say? Continue to argue pointlessly? I posted a paper that answered your questions on "morning and evening" Tup said she "skimmed it" but had no use for it. Maybe you will read it. Here it is: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/8449/days.html This paper covers in adequate detail the isse of "yom, ereb, and boqer" and the proper exegetical perspective. Give it a read, its worth it. Death is also covered, and I agree with this perspective, so no sense in me retyping it all, just read that paper. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame