Archivedbad theology of Dr Ross.Aineo, I am sorry for your medical condition, truly so. I must then attribute that with all forgivenss to your mispost above. The only thing that come through on my end of that post was "BTW, I have not given up trying to identify the man I heard on the radio". Nothing about how often you watch TV/listen to the radio or how long ago this supposed event occured. You may have posted that somewhere, but not on the thread in which we were engaged, and I ignored nothing. I mean no disrespect, I am just setting the record straight. You also accused me of "arrogance", and said I was wrong when I assumed that you were implying the day/age issue was salvational, then in this post you say "you bet your booties it can be". Which is it Aineo, am I wrong and arrogant in my assumption, or was I right on, as your most recent post suggests. If this John Kerry like flopping of positions is truly medicine induced, I apologize. By the way, I agree the bible is inerrant cover to cover, what I disagree with is your assertion that a YE perspective is the only literal approach. I believe an OE perspective is just as literal, and better literary and scriptural exegesis. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame