Tuppence
I respectfully request that you read the link on my last post, and notice that I asked you very pointed questions about how you relate this topic to this thread. You have totally failed to acknowledge any of the points in my last post, instead focusing on the day/age controvery.
Again, that is not the point of this thread, as I pointed out earlier. Specifically Aineo accused Ross of endorseing by the vast majority of his theology, a 'word of faith' doctrine. I ask you respectfully to cease this line of off topic posts, and focus on what this thread is about.
If you want to start a debate thread on the proper biblical exegesis of the day/age controversy, I will be glad to engage you. Its funny how you totally ignored all the fallicies in the posted essay that I brought up, and focused on these other areas. I wonder why?...but not on this thread.
By the way, the posted link I left you answers each and every one of your points...did you read it?