ArchivedENOUGH!![/quote] Well, you are not using common sense as I thought you would. You are using situations in which there are exceptions. I'm talking in a general sense. Don't people who are caught after committing murder usually face a consequence? There are few that get away with it, but that's why as humans we use things such as probabilities and percentages to clarify things. The brain tumor incident was not a result from sin in terms of an act committed(it was a result from sin, becuase it is because of sin in the world that we have diseases in the world), but this was obviously an exception and it was not because the person sinned that they got a tumor. But when you look overall, the homosexual lifestyle is very dangerous and sinful. There are some homosexuals who don't use drugs, but that still does not make their act righteous. There are some who don't kill but steal. Does that make them any more righteous than the ones who kill. All have sinned and fell short of the Glory of God. Ahhhhh, then you see my point. In your opening statements you posted percentages to see the OVERALL consequences of gay men, but it is obvious that gay women would be less infected. If you use common sense I guess you can see why. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame