Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionJM: LOL, that's not even defensible. I have done two things with regard to the individuals you mentioned: (1) Noted that they have published no ID science that I could criticize. Would you rather I invent science publications for them and then criticize the invented publications? Those people you mentioned with scientific credentials have published a significant body of normal science (behe, poene), but that does not make ID correct or scientific. They need to publish the scientific basis for ID (heck even the Wedge ID strategy acknowledges that this must be done). As you noted, they have not published in the scientific literature on the topic of ID. (2) I have noted the overtly religious background of the ID folks mentioned and the link of ID to those beliefs. It's not backstabbing, it's simply an observation. JM: I know that one individual complains about this, but that hardly makes it a reality. JM: You asked me to comment on ID. I posted a link to one of my comments on Behe (whose name you provided). I also posted a copy of the Wedge strategy endorsed by many ID advocates. So far as I know, posting factual information and answering direct requests for comments on ID is not one of the hallmark signs of the paranoid. So, I'll ask again, politely as ever....where can I find the scientific papers on ID? So far I've been reduced to commenting on popular book titles which you now tell me is disallowed. I'm very keen to discuss the scientific merits of ID, but you have to be willing to show me where this science is located. I simply have not found a single scientific article on ID. Cheers Joe Meert |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame