Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionAs I said before, I'll chime in on the specific points that interest me... It's fair to claim that Genesis is not a myth. But how do you back it up to show that it truly isn't? Only evidence can prove if it is or not. That being said, ALL "mythology" is eyewitness accounts. They didn't just spring out of the ground. Humans recorded what they claimed were real events. Fine. How do you judge whether they have any reality outside this claim? It took science a while to "catch up" with an idea that we had a supercontinent? You make it sound like a race. Science doesn't have an agenda as to what it declares is true. It doesn't matter if they discovered it 6000 years ago or 2 hours. If they proved their theory based on observable, TESTABLE, evidence, then it's as true now as it was since the begininning of time! And besides the point, if you want to try to present Genesis as being accurate to science, then try to refute THESE arguments. I'd be amazed to see you even try: http://www.creationtheory.org/Introduct ... esis.shtml I have to agree with Tuppence on this one.... it's not fair to call her a liar without proof that she is deliberately saying something she knows is not correct. She may be WRONG mind you, but that has nothing to do with intent, and you HAVE to be intentionally deceiving to be a liar. Just be careful with the way you say things. It's far more valuable to have you on this board then to be thrown off for accusations gone a little too far... |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame