Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionJM: I absolutely have never supported any court decision that mandates religion must stay out of school. I've only supported decisions that keep religion out of science classes. There is a very clear distinction. As I said, I am in strong favor of teaching various religions in philosophy or comparitive religion classes. JM: Yes, so....do you expect me to disagree on this? If so, then you will be disappointed. JM: It means it is not scientific. If and when they produce testable scientific hypotheses then we can discuss its inclusion into the science curricula. At present, there is no scientific content in ID. JM: LOL, that's the whole point though isn't it? I've asserted that ID is a socio-political agenda not a scientific subject. You've inadvertently agreed. JM: Name 5 who do not have some socio-political or religious reason for backing ID. JM: Right this is exactly what I teach. I also teach them that there are many psuedoscientific enterprises out there that have socio-political or economic goals. Examples include ID, Ye-creationism, beer commercials and political ads. btw...I should also note that I do discuss ID in my science classes as an excellent example of pseudoscience. Cheers Joe Meert |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame