Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionJM: Ok, last time. I know from my own experience on other forums and in dealing with the cre-evo debate that Behe is often cited by ye-creationists as strong evidence for their position. I merely try to point this out when I see Behe's name bantered about on boards like this. Obviously, you understand Behe's position and that is fine. Hopefully any lurkers or others who might misconstrue Behe's points on IC as supportive of YE-creationism will after reading through this thread understand that he is not a ye-creationist although he does have some issues with evolutionary biology. Now onto your other point. Ye-creationism was soundly refuted by the scientific community many years ago. If you were to examine the list of scientists supporting a much younger earth in earlier centuries, the list would be extensive scaled to today's. However, the list of scientists supporting a young earth today is extremely small and they lack scientific credibility because the young earth position has been repeatedly been falsified by modern (speaking post 1850) science. The list of those supporting a young earth can be directly tied to those who believe the bible speaks of a young earth. There simply is not any strong scientific evidence supporting a young earth. Cheers Joe Meert |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame