Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionSure I can carry on a civil discussion but for me to accept something as true it has to be shown to be true, not defined as true. The age of the earth is defined, not shown by experimenation, ID is a sound scientific theory with some big names behind it. Which is where the speed of light comes into the discussion. Has the speed of light been constant since the big bang? Is it your contention that the amount of energy and mass have been constant since the big bang? If not then the speed of light has to have changed or E=mc^2 is out of balance. As to evolution I have read enough of this one subject to find it totally mythological. You can try to show otherwise but evolution is simply illogical. And BTW, no matter how hard you try to use science to prove your thesis there will always be some who accept the inerrancy of the Bible including Genesis 1 that you will never convince everyone you are correct. The socio-political benefits of denying Genesis 1 are minimal. If benefitting mankind is your goal then work to improve the conditions of the poor, homeless, mentally and physically challenged, those with major diseases that need cures, improve all of our youths availability to a good education, and etc. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame