Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussionThere is always dispute in science. That's the beauty of it. It's NOT a fixed viewpoint. If they discover better evidence that explains things and it is testable, then they change their consensus on what they accept as fact. If they have "defined" that Darwinism is truth, then knowing how science works, I'm completely confident that they are correct. I'm sure there are disputes on ASPECTS of evolutionary biology, but the basic framework is considered indisputable. As to the dissenters, I made the analogy before about the AIDS dissidents, and it STILL applies. They would be addressed if they DESERVED to be addressed. They were addressed when they first started dissenting, but their arguments against the theory were in effect only pointing out gaps of knowledge that were already identified as such. They still had nothing valid to say against the HEART of the theory and so there wasn't anything further to discuss. So instead they set up a special website, spreading doubt against the whole hiv concept and made it look like because they were no longer being taken seriously, there was a grand conspiracy to prevent their views from challenging the accepted view. Do you not see how this is a perfect parallel to the groups trying to denigrate evolution? Even worse than the AIDS dissidents is not only that they are pointing out gaps of knowledge in Evolution as proof for it not being "proven", but also trying to introduce the completely unnecessary variable of "God" into the picture with no testable terms of his inclusion. This is why they are in general "ignored". They don't DESERVE to be addressed. If they truly bring forth convincing evidence that challenges the theory of evolution, rest assured, it WILL be addressed and verified. Maybe they will, but they haven't yet. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame