You are back to lists. Lists don't mean a thing. If number of times a name is used in Scripture then Paul is used more often than Peter.
Don't be obtuse about who the Bishop of Alexander was under Constantine, he held the same position with the same authority as the Bishop of Rome.
What webmaster wrote is closer to actual history than the Catholic Church's version of history. How did the Catholic Church gets its wealth in the past? It robbed temples and with some of the Pope's armies fought wars of conquest. You cannot deny history, but then that is what the Catholic Church has done for centuries.
On honest Prostestant historian has accepted Catholic propaganda and many honest Protestant historians have not, so what is your point? To deny the Bishop of Rome took political control after the western empire fell is real history what is not real history is the Bishop of Rome was accepted as the supreme head of the church from the 1st century forward.
Paul told us to study to show ourselves approved so what you posted about us not being able to understand Scripture on our own is simply not true. Yes, we should be under our pastor but that does not mean the Catholic Church interpretation is a valid interpretation since Peter warned about "personal interpretations" and all Catholic doctrine is the result of the personal interpretation of men.