ArchivedCalling all Catholics!You got yourself banned once for you arrogance, and I have no compunctions about banning you again. You brought up the fact Peter is listed first in the NT. I was simply demonstrating that being first in a list is immaterial. If you don't want to be proved wrong with your idiotic comments either don't make them or don't get sarcastic in return. Now let deal with historical fact and not Catholic propaganda. This is historical fact. The Bishop of Rome was not consider a Pope with control over all of Christianity then or now. I notice you did not comment on the article I linked to. I have noticed on the 4 boards where Catholics are attempting to defend their heretical beliefs that when confronted with real history and people don't bow to their arrogant deniel of real history they get sarcastic. When asked to prove the Apostles taught Catholic doctrine Catholics respond with prove they did not. Well, the burden of proof is on the one who makes the affirmative statement. Now can you address real history or are you simply going to appeal to Catholic myth and get sarcastic? Peter was never accepted as Pope in the Bible, and Jesus did not give Peter special powers or authority over His Church. We can prove this by the fact James was the Bishop of Jerusalem, that Paul took Peter to task over doctrine and his hypocritical lapse in adhering to the pronouncements of the Council of Jerusalem, that the same power were given to all the disciples by Jesus, and by appealing to Greek grammar. All you have is the "tradition of men" and mistranslated documents from those you refer to as church fathers. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame