Homosexual Discussion Forum10% MythMy rant against you was in a Jewish way. Ever read Ramban? He goes on rants about how all other scholars are morons and should just sit down and shut up. He is also considered one of the great Jewish thinkers. Just because I fervently disagree doesn't mean I don't want to hear your side of the arguement. I want to know why you disagree with me so I can make myself a better person by listening to you. It was a litterary convention used to cause interest in what I was speaking about. It is a well known fact that saying something controversial in a sarcastic manner grabs peoples attention. It is impossible to "force" homosexuality on "confused and vulnerable" children. It is, however, possible to educate children as to what homosexuality really is. This way, kids who are naturally gay wont feel alone, those who are bisexual won't be afraid of themselves, and those who are straight won't feel the need to ridicule others for their sexual orientation. All those things are good. As for children being "confused and vulnerable", that irks a very deep pet peeve I have. I happen to have been a child not to long ago and, with something called a memory, I remember many things. Some things were good, some were bad. The bad made be strong and the good made me happy. I grew up in a bery liberal atmosphere (does it show?) and I happen to know many people who were gay or bisexual. I have had many homosexual teachers and mentors. Also, my first partner was bisexual. My first partner also happens to be female. As far as I can tell, I am hetro-sexual although I wouldn't be afraid of it if I were gay. Most of my friends from my youth are hetro-sexual (I think all but I'm not sure). However, I don't tease gay, I don't make their lives hard, and I don't try to "convert" them to being hetr-sexual. On the topic of marriage: it is a tough issue with many sides. I see the side that marriage is an institution to produce children and has historically been between a man and a woman. However, I also see many stable homosexual couples with children who could really use the legal benefits of marriage. I also see many disfuntional hetro-sexual couples who should never have children. I now think that the country should abolish marriage as a legal term, replace it with universal civil unions between any two consenting people. And then allow churches to define what marriage is and who can be "married" within their religion. Its a hard topic. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame