Greetings H2O,
Thanks for your reply…
Apple wrote:
Even your buddy Deedat succumbed to the fact that your god is derived from the root “ilaha”.
Well lets see some say, according to Lane, that the derivation of that word is uncertain.
Quote:
إِلَه {ilah} is the same as the Hebrew {eloahh} and the Chaldee {elahh} ; and is of uncertain derivation: accor. to some
More thanl likely the reason they dont agree to it being derived from اله cause this root does not support alif masoorah in إِلَه which I agree with.
So….now you are back to using Lane to support your position de-jour….?
It is clear that Lane “filed” your god as a derivative of “ilaha”.
Period.
End of Story.
He also stated
TWICE that your “allah” was a “god”….lower case….
Surely, you are not that naïve…
Well….you do manage a Denny’s restaurant…….so….this explains a lot to
US… :roll:
Quote:
Apple wrote:1) If you choose to acknowledge the root derivation, then you must also admit that you worship a pagan Arab idol knock-off
Why certainly we reject it.
Of course you reject it…..would you actually want to eat crow right about now…?
You have too much invested in your false faith to back out now….
Islam is a dead end faith.
Apple wrote:
2) If you choose the “arabicized” route, then first you need to come forth with a valid reference for your position (which there are none!); and then by adhering to this line of reasoning you would be admitting that the god that you worship is a hand-me-down god and not pure Arabic
The Quran is our reference.
Great….then I’ll ask you once more to show
US one single solitary verifiable reference that states that your god was Arabicized…
As the Japanese say…rotts-a-ruck….
Have fun with your god……