Aineo wrote:You can find what appears to be evolutionary adaptation within a species, but what has not been demonstrated in upward or macroevolution to a higher species.
When you consider biochemistry, astronomy, physics, and the other scientific disciplines into the equation evolution is a proven myth.
There is no fossil evidence that can show a reptile evolving into a bird, or a reptile evolving into a mammal.
What has been shown over the years is the Bible has not changed in the last couple thousands years. Although some manuscripts don’t agree with others, the basic message is the same in all of them. The Bible contains books that were written much more than 2000 years ago, but the subject of this thread is not creationism vs. evolution.
Macroevolution is illogical and cannot be shown scientifically to be a valid theory.
Who ever said a reptile evolved into a bird or a reptile evolved into a mammal? There continues to be confusion over what macroevolution is on this board. Some posters are trying to make macroevolution some spectacular event that can't be proven when that is simply not the case.
To put it simply, macroevolution is nothing more than microevolution over time. Usually great spans of time which can not be reproduced in a laboratory with out the aid of a time machine.