Science, Creation & Evolutionsubstitute biology teacherThat's pretty typical of TO's nonsense. Resort to imagination... It is not a matter of half of the FUNCTION of an eye, which is what they are twisting it to mean. The point is that half of the ANATOMY of an eye is a totally different thing and results in zero vision. Evolution arguments trying to make a point for the increasing complexity of the anatomy of a mammal (or trilobite) eye which rest their case on the function of the eye are entirely ludicrous and show the poverty of any evidence they can rake up for their ideas. A man can get along without the function of his eyes. But no eye at all can function unless it is complete anatomically. Replacing the idea of anatomy with function is highly deceitful, and typical, of Talk Origins. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame