Oh help....
Jovaro, you are worse in biology than you are in physics!
The DEFINITION of the 'fittest' is the one to leave the most offspring.
Which 5% of the human eye would you like to bequeath to a dog in order to get 5% of human vision? Here is a picture of the eye so you can choose:
http://www.stlukeseye.com/Anatomy.asp
The space shuttle was DESIGNED to fly as it does. It is rocket propelled. I assume you are not claiming the 'pre-wing' animals were also propelled in that way. For sure you will not admit the wing was designed. And please note as well that rocket 'wing' was designed after full wings on airplanes were invented. It would be one thing to claim that winged animals devolved into wingless or flightless animals, for loss of function is a lot more comprehensible biologically. But you are claiming the opposite -- that winged animals evolved from non-winged animals. Even if that were genetically possible, which it isn't, the transitional stage(s) would be as mentioned in the lead post -- inoperable, clumsy, and unsuited for survival.
Word will give you some interesting things, I'm sure. All will be in terms of devolution of the original program due to errors.
Please, please learn about things before you type about them. Either that or just become a newspaper reporter so you don't have to learn before you spout off.