Science, Creation & EvolutionHas there been a good argument against Evolution?well, just got on this thread, but let me say, that believing needs to be based in evidence. Evolutions paradigm causes a huge stumbling block for science, in that the basis behind evolution is 'naturalism' and that intrinsically denies God's hand in creation. Unfortunately, the scientific community overwhelmingly rejects supernaturalism based on their paradigm, not because evidence does not point to it. To answer the original question of this thread, there are several credible rebuttals to mainstream evolution. Origin of life senarios have all been proven bankrupt, for one. Fossil records evidence against Darwins gradualism is another. A total lack of a credible explanation for rapid and repeated evolution is a third. Lack of explanations for homologous structurers having different embryonic origins, the convergence of traits in unrelated species are also both huge problems for evolution to answer. The truth about evolution is that it has more holes than swiss cheese, but secular society refuses to accept a 'supernatural' explanation, dispite the scientific evidence that the answer lies beyond science, and science itself is showing that to be true. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame