Aineo wrote:Non-Christian wrote:Aineo wrote:Jovaro wrote:I suppose the silence means that there hasn't been anything....
Please note that.
I have not read the whole thread however, has anyone brought up the human eye? Darwin is said to have written that the human eye cannot be explained by evolution.
But a fish eye can?
Please, Darwin is not the end-all answer to evolution. That's like saying Edison is the end-all answer to electricty.
Did I post the human eye disproves evolution? No, I said Darwin wrote the human eye cannot be explained by evolution. There is a vast gulf between those two comments.
Javaro, I seem to recall in another thread where you supported the statistical analysis of human behavior and now you are saying statistics is neither a science nor reliable. Statistics is a branch of mathematics, which is a science.