Science, Creation & EvolutionHas there been a good argument against Evolution?But you can compare the eyes of modern animals, which is how evolutionists show evolution. You can compare the bones of fossils with modern bones, but that does not prove evolution. We can compare the DNA of an ape with a man, however similarities in DNA does not prove man evolved from a common ancestor. The only thing DNA proves is that here is a common designer. All sea going vessels "evolved" from the first "boat". All aircraft "evolved" from the first "aircraft" that actually flew. Similarities in DNA can be evidence that "a designer" used the same basic design to "create" animals with "similar" characteristics. Each animal has the “characteristics” required to survive. Eagles need keen eyesight to see their prey from extreme heights, man doesn’t. Evolutionists can view this as natural selection in evolution and a creationist can see this as “intelligent design”. You cannot prove either position so it boils down to what you want to believe. Christians believe in an intelligent designer; evolutionists believe in random chance evolving higher and more complex systems that allow animals to survive. However, nature will always take the easiest and simplest path. The evolution of higher and more complex systems is illogical as the more complex a system the more energy it takes to maintain the system. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame