Science, Creation & EvolutionDinosaurs?That is because you ask stupid questions. Or maybe not stupid, but you know the saying: one fool can ask more then 10 wise men can answer. Einstein introduced a new model of physics, just as Newton did before him. Both models are approximations of reality. Einsteins model is better than Newtons and newer models might well be better than Einsteins. The existence of better models then Einsteins is not a reason not to accept his model. Einsteins model might be better than Newtons but that is no reason to throw away Newtonian physics. It still works very well. BTW, the existence of physicists who don't believe Einstein is a really bad reason to not believe Einstein. If that is going to be you're criteria to believe anything, than there ain't much you can believe. I will rephrase it for you: I believe that c is a constant because otherwise most observations and measured data don't make sense. That better? It is in the same article I linked to earlier. You just need to read it a little better. What other questions did you have? My question remains: Do you have proof that mass (at rest!!) changes, matching Setterfields theory? P.S. (there is an interesting article on wikipedia, kilogram, that actually says that the standard kilogram has lost 50 gram the last century. To dampen your happiness: this doesn't match with the Setterfield theory at all!) |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame