I see you are not serious about debating this topic. I ask you to make your case for reparative therapy since you brought it up in this thread and all you've done is appeal to authority by insisting Dr. Satinover supports this practice (which says nothing really) instead of making an actual argument yourself.
Then you make a strawman argument by implying that I had said that anyone who's part of this forum is support its ideologies, when it was blatantly clear that I had questioned your support for such homophobic people and never have I seen you actually counter homophobic statements made by them.
This whole thread has been a charade. I asked a simple request and that was for you to support your assertion that changing sexual orientation is feasible and possibly. You provided one flawed study, brought up Dr. Throckmorton whose conclusions are entirely suspicious and then characterized my rebuttal as 'attacks'. Then you wander off making useless, irrelevant and tiresome statements of the APA for four whole pages while you continue to preach your empty rhetoric over and over again.
And lastly, you attempted to claim that I made a assertion on reparative therapy in this thread by bringing it up from an old thread. My position was and is the same. Ex-gay groups use reparative therapy and it is unproven and thus, potentially dangerous. This can be seen through this thread and the Bisexuality thread.
Your posts are filled with red herrings and other fallacies. It's not often I see someone commit multiple red herrings, an appeal to authority, a strawman, a shift of the burden of proof and an ad hominem in a single post. Congratulations, Aineo; you've just proved quite to be incapable of making a single honest argument. Ban me if you wish. I don't care to continue this ridiculous thread anymore. My position stands and your intellectually dishonest posts have done far more damage to your argument and credibility than I could have.