Aineo wrote:And you have a dirty mouth that needs to be cleaned up.
Oops. I said freakin'. My goodness, how vulgar. :roll:
Spitzer was one of the supporters of the APA's 1973 decision and as I posted on the other thread was quoted as saying if other conditions such as fetishes were as organized as the gay lobby they might get thier psychological conditions normalized. So now that Spitzer has realized that the APA decision was not totally accurate he is targeted by other's in his profession for exposing the fraud perpetrated by the APA.
Again, more claims without evidence... as usual.
What you have failed to realize is your whole house of cards is based on a decision made in 1973 that appealed to Kinsey and other flawed (to use your terminology) studies and gay activists disrupting APA annual meetings. If that decision had never been made this whole discussion would not be taking place.
More irrelevant, strawman attacks. My whole house of cards is based on YOUR ability to back your claims, which you've adequately failed. However, if you want to make more rants on the APA which have absolutely nothing to do with my argument, no one's going to stop you.
The fact of the matter is that some people can and have successfully changed their sexual orientation and to deny this is to deny reality. You can resort to your petty name calling, denigrating highly qualified and experienced psychologists and psychiatrists all you want but all you are doing is showing the depths of your bigotry and hatred for reality. You are also demonstrating that tolerance for opposing views based on sound scientific research is not part of your agenda.
Oh my, Aineo repeating his unsupported claims again? Say it ain't so!
As to making claims they cannot back up I again suggest your review your posts in the Bisexuality forum where that was your main method of attack. Your insistence that reparative therapy was developed by ex-gay ministries, that ex-gay ministries appealed to Kinsey's 1948 study and etc. are simply outright lies and claims you cannot prove.
Oh wait.. you mean the thread where you yourself posted Kinsey's 1948 study as evidence?
Your hypocrisy is hilarious.
Now if you cannot be civil your account will be terminated.
I'm actually being extremely civil considering that most people who argue with you would probably scream in frustration over your mindless ranting of irrelevant topics and incessantly repeating your claims backed by only one flawed study.
It does not matter if you terminate my account at this point. You have already demonstrated your inability to defend your claims of sexual orientation change and your delusional obsession with the APA. My points speak for themselves. And any rational person who thoroughly reads this debate can come to their own conclusions and I am quite confident that those conclusions will be in my favor.