Religious Cults & False Prophets~ Discussions and DebatesThe Nicolaitane DoctrineThe point of me drawing from church history is to show how Prostestant Christianity is still held in bondage by the Roman Catholic Church it claims to have separated from. The early Church (pre-Roman Catholic) was made up of independent assemblies which collectively made up the Body of Christ. I have shown in my various posts that history has proven the pre-Roman Catholic Church were Oneness ("Modalism: Heresy Or Catholic Persecution Of Truth") and they baptized in the name of Jesus ("Few Were Saved By Water", "Critical Identity of Baptism"). As a Oneness Apostolic the "Oneness" and "Baptism in Jesus' name" are vital doctrines of my faith. These doctrines are not new doctrines but the original Apostles' Doctrine as recorded in Holy Scripture that were practiced by the early Believers. The early Church became a "valley of dry bones" much like Israel as a nation. As Israel went away into captivity so did the early Church go through the dark ages. As Israel has been restored as a nation so also the True Church has been restored. What brought on the down fall of Israel was disobedience and what brought on the down fall of the Church was heresy. Without the evidence of history my claims would be mere here say despite all the Scriptural debate about doctrine. And please don't get me wrong here - the only thing I hate is heresy and falsehood not people. The damage that has been done was wrought by a few who crept into the Church ( 2 Peter 2:1) which gained control over the many (laity). And it is still going on today as I write this post. The Roman Catholic Church of today boasts about billion souls it holds captive not to mention the millions of Prostestants that remain tied to it by the trinity. Religious bondage is what the Nicolaitane deeds and doctrine is all about. Islam is another example of Nicolaitane style control - another billion or so souls held captive. Your comment about my post you quoted above shows you did not read or ponder about what I said in that post. It also shows your hypocrisy for you have critized me of prejudice against Catholics earlier in this thread and then you make that comment, "I would think I was reading a post from a Catholic".
Please, Aineo. I have quoted and expounded on Scripture after Scripture throughout all my posts. See the closed Trinity Debate thread, pages 10-13 for example. I do not condone the actions of Calvin or anyone else. But it would appear the daughter has inhereted some of the ways of her mother in this case. The issue of the trinity I raised in this thread is that it is a Roman Catholic Doctrine carried forward into Protestantism. History has proven it. Scripture has proven it to be false doctrine - a riddle of contradictions. History has also not forgotten the sins of Catholicism and neither has God, "For her sins have reached unto the heavens, and God hath remembered her iniquities." (Rev 18:5) And unless the tie of the trinity is broken those tied by it will be partakers of her sins and will receive of her plagues. (Rev 18:4) |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame