ArchivedPA officials guilty of blatant violation of First AmendmentDo you have a link to a comprehensive major site that represents a major percentage of scientists that verifies this? How are you getting this information? I'm not aware of any argument regarding what is scientific proof. It's pretty straightforward. If you can observe it, describe it, and predict observable results using specific terms as a theory, then you have evidence. If others can also do the same thing and objectively verify the same conclusions, then it's generally considered proof. But what is this really saying? That it's evident God exists and can be seen in 1) His eternal power What is this? Electricity? Light? How would you prove what "power" they are referring to? 2) divine nature We cannot see him, measure him, or even have him ANSWER anyone one on one that we can show to anyone. That mean's he is NOT to be seen in nature. So how can we tell he's divine? So this scripture concludes with since everything that can be made is made by him, we see him in these. But again, where is the proof? We have none of God. Science can explain the origins of life, the universe, and nature without need the extra variable of "god" for it to be necessary. Occam's Razor cuts him out of every single scientific theory. So I don't see how this scripture really proves anything? Gotta eat...I'll answer more later.. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame