Science, Creation & EvolutionNEW THEORY!Actually I do not see tuppence's attitude as being worthy of criticism. Here is what I posted: Tuppence has excercised more self-control and patience with those who have called her husband everything but a scientist on this forum than those who are so arrogant they refuse to check the data she has linked to. In case you have not noticed tuppence is a moderator of this forum and has adhered to our posting rules right down the line (something even I do not always do in the heat of a debate). She has not resorted to charactar assassination as you have done. As to Dr. Ross, I have taken the time to do an Internet search on Dr. Ross and found that he is not accepted as a trusted authority by most Christian creationist and non-creationist scientitists. His only real backers are evangelical preachers who grap onto any scientist who believes Genesis 1-11 is true. BTW, I did let my mouth (opinion) overload my butt with the remark about his science for which I apologize. But his theology is still suspect in spite of his denominational affiliation. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame