Tuppence, to debate and pass rebuttals is not going to be fruitful, as you are as convinced in your perspective as you think I am in mine.
Notice I used the word "perspective"...you misquoted or quoted me out of context in your reply to my post when you said:
'If you, as you say, are 'firmly established' in what you believe to be true, then I would suggest science is not the field for you'
I am firmly established in my perspective, not in my conclusions, as with all science, conclusions must be able to conform to the data.
I don't agree that your husbands data is accurate, but I really don't want to banter it. You have posted links to his charts, here is a link that disagrees with him. I am sure he is familiar with it, and has rebuttals waiting.....I cannot wait to here them. What would really convince me is to have a corroborative authority from a known academic institution not with a religious agenda, verify his facts. Is there any corroboration?
http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/cdecay/cdecay.pdf