The data is here:
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html
The fact that the data was handled correctly is here:
http://www.setterfield.org/data.htm
This has NOTHING to do with any belief system.
Discussion regarding the different aspects is here:
http://www.setterfield.org/discussionindex.htm
Barry started out as an 'old earther'. It was the data which convinced him otherwise. That is why I said he went at the thing data first.
It does not matter who disagrees with him or how world-renowned they are; the change in some of the atomic constants has been measured by physicists and astrophysicists and they were not creationists at all! I don't know if they believed in anything the Bible had to say at all! The basic charts on c, h, and m are here:
http://www.setterfield.org/Charts.htm#graphs
Would you please show me where you see any religious influence in the data gathering or handling? The data are the declared official values of those particular constants at the times indicated.
The references are at the bottom of the page, available for you to check.
HOWEVER, if you are not curious about all this and only want to fight it without looking at the data itself, there is nothing that can be done about that.
Those who have looked at the data are the ones who are asking more about Barry's work and are asking to see him and talk to him.
If you, as you say, are 'firmly established' in what you believe to be true, then I would suggest science is not the field for you, for new data and challenges often require a more flexible point of view.
Sir Henry Dale, one-time President of the Royal Society of London, made an important comment in his retirement speech: "Science should not tolerate any lapse of precision, or neglect any anomaly, but give Nature's answers to the world humbly and with courage."
Barry's remark, regarding that statement, can be seen on the front page of his website:
To do so may not place one in the mainstream of modern science, but at least we will be searching for truth and moving ahead rather than maintaining the scientific status quo.-- Barry Setterfield, March 7, 2002