Mrs Setterfield
1. I did not malign your husband personally in the least...
2. The paper you post is ludicrous, and no, I do not have the time at the moment to point out all of its faults..but I will endeavor to point out a few as time permits.
3. Have you read Ross's latest book? He gives all of the references of the church fathers he was refering to in detail. I would be glad to provide you with that reference, but I am sure you have access to it.
4. Lastly, Mrs Setterfield, you demonstrate a very belligerent attitude for a Christian, and I will not "back out of the discussion" just because my time frames are different than yours. Your arrogance here is astonishing.
In regard to your first quoted reference:
For instance, quoting Gentry's polonium studies is in the same catagory of science as your husbands decay of c in my book. Now, I don't mean this as a "malign" of any man...only their theory. Yet the paper you posted the critique is given by someone who would quote Gentry's work as refutation of Ross???? Again, no credibility here, sorry.